Leeds Decade of change 1962-72 photos

Off-topic discussions, musings and chat
Post Reply
Chrism
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sun 20 Jan, 2008 8:26 am

Post by Chrism »

If he didn't take the pix, which he didn't as he would have been only 4-7 years old, how can he copyright them? They're not his pix.
Sit thissen dahn an' tell us abaht it.

Phill_dvsn
Posts: 4423
Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 5:47 am

Post by Phill_dvsn »

I only added a link to the guys photos as i thought they were an interesting collection of Leeds photos relevant to Secret Leeds. I maybe would have had second thoughts if I thought they was going to be any aggro about them. I certainly wouldn't be happy if it were my photo stream been discussed in this way on another forum. As far as I can see the guy has been good enough to upload them to share with others, the question of who took them, who owns copyright, and indeed who he would like to/and what type of comments he gets on them is entirely at his own discretion. It is his photostream to do with as he see's fit.I think that's a perfectly fair comment to make under the circumstances.             
My flickr pictures are herehttp://www.flickr.com/photos/phill_dvsn/Because lunacy was the influence for an album. It goes without saying that an album about lunacy will breed a lunatics obsessions with an album - The Dark side of the moon!

drapesy
Posts: 2614
Joined: Sat 24 Feb, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by drapesy »

Phill_dvsn wrote: I only added a link to the guys photos as i thought they were an interesting collection of Leeds photos relevant to Secret Leeds. I maybe would have had second thoughts if I thought they was going to be any aggro about them. I certainly wouldn't be happy if it were my photo stream been discussed in this way on another forum. As far as I can see the guy has been good enough to upload them to share with others, the question of who took them, who owns copyright, and indeed who he who'd like to/and what type of comments he gets on them is entirely at his own discretion. It is his photostream to do with as he see's fit.I think that's a perfectly fair comment to make under the circumstances.          I agree
there are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand ternary, those that don't and those that think this a joke about the binary system.

drapesy
Posts: 2614
Joined: Sat 24 Feb, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by drapesy »

[quotenick="Leodian"] yorkiesknob wrote: Cardiarms wrote: What's hanging over the road?http://www.flickr.com/photos/cliffordst ... 576221860/ [/quoteI think its street lighting , if you notice theres one further down . No footpath light poles are visible in the photo.Only a guess though.Cheers Yorkie Interesting that Vicar Lane was clearly a one-way street then. It also looks much wider than it does now! It certainly was one-way - running North-South( the pavements were narrower than they are now). Briggate was one-way from South to North.    
there are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand ternary, those that don't and those that think this a joke about the binary system.

dogduke
Posts: 1407
Joined: Thu 03 Jan, 2008 6:47 am

Post by dogduke »

The photos are great and it is lovey that we have thechance to view them.I understand Phill and Drapesy's viewpoint but at the end of the dayits the old saying about giving credit where credit is due and in this case he has not done so.There is as far as I can see only the one reference to Leeds Civic Trust Leeds City Transport 1968Many of the photo`s of Leeds street scenes in 1968 were taken from this vehicle for Leeds Civic Trust and feature in my set Leeds : Decade of change 62 to 72
Consciousness: That annoying time between naps.90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at.

Phill_dvsn
Posts: 4423
Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 5:47 am

Post by Phill_dvsn »

dogduke wrote: The photos are great and it is lovey that we have thechance to view them.I understand Phill and Drapesy's viewpoint but at the end of the dayits the old saying about giving credit where credit is due and in this case he has not done so.There is as far as I can see only the one reference to Leeds Civic Trust Leeds City Transport 1968Many of the photo`s of Leeds street scenes in 1968 were taken from this vehicle for Leeds Civic Trust and feature in my set Leeds : Decade of change 62 to 72 He's obviously got the collection of photos to hand, either the originals, copies, or he has access to them. I really don't think calling his integrity into question is the right thing to do here. I'm somewhat saddened to see an innocent link to a valueable set of archive photos degenerate this way to be honest.Unless anyone states otherwise, and makes claim to those photographs being theirs, I think it's only fair to make the judgement that he either has full permission to show these photos, or has inherited this collection lawfully. Afterall, how many times do members of Secret Leeds upload photos from Leodis without adding any copyright at all? I for one am guilty of that.Infact some of those older photos in his collection will be available to the public to use soon when the Copyright has lapsed (I believe after 50 years, or when the photographer dies/which might have already happened)Really, just enjoy the photos. God forbid the guy see's this and decides it's not worth the aggravation and deletes the entire collection.                
My flickr pictures are herehttp://www.flickr.com/photos/phill_dvsn/Because lunacy was the influence for an album. It goes without saying that an album about lunacy will breed a lunatics obsessions with an album - The Dark side of the moon!

Brandy
Posts: 1550
Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 8:03 am

Post by Brandy »

drapesy wrote: Phill_dvsn wrote: I only added a link to the guys photos as i thought they were an interesting collection of Leeds photos relevant to Secret Leeds. I maybe would have had second thoughts if I thought they was going to be any aggro about them. I certainly wouldn't be happy if it were my photo stream been discussed in this way on another forum. As far as I can see the guy has been good enough to upload them to share with others, the question of who took them, who owns copyright, and indeed who he who'd like to/and what type of comments he gets on them is entirely at his own discretion. It is his photostream to do with as he see's fit.I think that's a perfectly fair comment to make under the circumstances.          I agree And so do i.
There are only 10 types of people in the world -those who understand binary, and those that don't.

User avatar
chameleon
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Thu 29 Mar, 2007 6:16 pm

Post by chameleon »

raveydavey wrote: Funny, I commented on the pic of York Road showing the petrol stations and now the pic and all the comments have vanished. Not sure what is going on? I assume you mean from here Davey - if that was the one featuring the 16p/off 4 gallons, I saw it here yesterday morning - but as you say, no longer. Anyone deleted it in error ??    

munki
Posts: 929
Joined: Thu 25 Jan, 2007 5:16 am

Post by munki »

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cliffordst ... 21860/This is definitely Clifford! The lucky bugger hasn't changed that much...
'Are we surprised that men perish, when monuments themselves decay? For death comes even to stones and the names they bear.' - Ausonius.

kango
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun 30 Aug, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by kango »

yorkiesknob wrote: Only getting better . Heres another a great shot, notice the third ramp on the car delivery trailer , Seems like its dropping off the 3 wheeler Robin Reliant or the handicap vehicles.http://www.flickr.com/photos/cliffordst ... 21860/Also I think I was on that #50 bus on one of the Eastgate Photo .LOL.Cheers Yorkie     If I'm not mistaken Yorkie it looks very much like a Reliant Regal supervan three the Robins came much later, cracking archive and of a good quality too hope theres more .    

Post Reply