A very old Establishment down the Skulls head yard (Part 2)

Bunkers, shelters and other buildings
Post Reply
User avatar
uncle mick
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed 14 Jan, 2009 6:43 am

Post by uncle mick »

Croggy1 wrote: That document appears to be unavailable at the moment, Uncle Mick. Strange, I clicked on the link after posting & it was OKC@PDear Mr Briggs,The Victorian Society would like to comment on this application:14/01175/L1 3-7 Crown Street, Leeds LS2 7DA(Grade II, late C18, altered C19, C20)Listed Building application for change of use from mixed retail, café/restaurant, take-away and office use to public house and take-away; demolition of two storey rear extension; construction of staircase and lift core; addition of a terrace and balcony tothe ground and first floorsWe discussed this application at length. We decided that the age of the premises warranted a very careful survey and evaluation of existing details of the three individual buildings which formed the group and also that the application should be referredto the Georgian Group as the buildings were originally of their period.The extent of proposed internal alteration, to achieve the desired consistent floor levels through all three buildings, would be irreversible and would seriously damage the integrity of the three buildings. The application was therefore unacceptable and wetherefore object strongly to the scheme.I got back to it from http://tinyurl.com/k5w7bnqEdit - The original link seems to be OK nowhttp://tinyurl.com/qyzz6xn    

User avatar
Steve Jones
Posts: 1516
Joined: Fri 18 Jan, 2008 2:41 pm
Location: Wakefield

Post by Steve Jones »

Fair comment about referring it to the Georgian Society,however, in the light of the surveyors comments when the buildings were asessed for the application ,relating to structural instability due to joists being cut away etc. ;I would have thought any development would be better than it falling down partly ,which seemed to be a probability from the report!    
Steve JonesI don't know everything, I just like to give that impression!

User avatar
uncle mick
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed 14 Jan, 2009 6:43 am

Post by uncle mick »

English Heritage have their say on the plans of the development http://tinyurl.com/md58czeIn case the above link does not work try thishttp://tinyurl.com/k5w7bnq

User avatar
Steve Jones
Posts: 1516
Joined: Fri 18 Jan, 2008 2:41 pm
Location: Wakefield

Post by Steve Jones »

Second link works.English Heritage are broadly in favour and make some good points.I was amused by the comments about the row currently being aesthetically pleasing.They obviously haven't been to look at the hideous paint job on the gable near the road or the amount of eyesores attached to the buildings in the alleyway!
Steve JonesI don't know everything, I just like to give that impression!

Si
Posts: 4480
Joined: Wed 10 Oct, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Otley

Post by Si »

drapesy wrote: jim wrote: Perhaps pointing out how much positive advertising potential there would be in the event of the owners helping the skulls to be displayed in an accessible manner might help? News cover and a permanent plaque or similar giving them credit would be certainly be of value to any business. As I said in my post above any attempt to apply logic, reason or being a good citizen was met with a brick wall of flat refusal. Your welcome to try of course, but don't get your hopes up! I guess it depends how much "advertising" is likely to occur from this proposal. Perhaps we could stir things up with a chat to Phill's YEP contact again? If it becomes bigger news (developers versus Victorian Society, for example) then Dysons may look at it with fresh eyes?

User avatar
uncle mick
Posts: 1588
Joined: Wed 14 Jan, 2009 6:43 am

Post by uncle mick »

Update - Leeds Civic Trust have their sayhttp://tinyurl.com/k5w7bnq

User avatar
cnosni
Site Admin
Posts: 4199
Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by cnosni »

uncle mick wrote: Update - Leeds Civic Trust have their sayhttp://tinyurl.com/k5w7bnq I think the Trusts objections are warranted, and at least they offer alternative suggestions to the application that they would support.Cant see why another Take Away is needed myself either
Don't get me started!!My Flickr photos-http://www.flickr.com/photos/cnosni/Secret Leeds [email protected]

User avatar
Steve Jones
Posts: 1516
Joined: Fri 18 Jan, 2008 2:41 pm
Location: Wakefield

Post by Steve Jones »

cnosni wrote: Cant see why another Take Away is needed myself either I agree,there are some positive suggestions in there.It will be interesting to see what happens.
Steve JonesI don't know everything, I just like to give that impression!

String o' beads
Posts: 1362
Joined: Wed 06 Feb, 2008 6:09 pm

Post by String o' beads »

Glass from the Crown & Fleece for sale:http://www.ebay.ie/itm/CROWN-FLEECE-HOT ... 1047322008

String o' beads
Posts: 1362
Joined: Wed 06 Feb, 2008 6:09 pm

Post by String o' beads »

Does anyone have [paid] access to the British Newspaper archive website?I ask because I've found two of the elusive original stories from the YEP, that were published much later than the Radestock article.The tantalising previews I am able to view are from Diary of a Yorkshireman on the dates:1: Wednesday 20th November 1935'... soldiers acre stationed in the Leeds area, and some were billeted the Crown and Fleece Inn which that time faced the Corn Exchange. At ... 'and another snippet:'..There seems The Skulls in macabre explanation the two carved * skulls ...'2: Saturday 7th March 1953'... stone skulls In Crown Court. Klrkgate. Leeds, appeared In this paper year* ago. The account came from Mr. Thomas Wee re, then Registrar of Leeds. Parish Church, who ...'http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

Post Reply