New routes to get Leeds cycling

Railways, trams, buses, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Brunel
Posts: 1182
Joined: Thu 20 Mar, 2008 12:34 pm

Post by Brunel »


Tyke
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu 17 Nov, 2011 10:55 am

Post by Tyke »

Ok so long as they dont turn foot paths into cycle tracks.
Hunslet born and bread

Riponian
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu 08 Jan, 2009 11:28 am
Location: Work Leeds, home Ripon and the 36 inbetween

Post by Riponian »

Good luck, but it's not just the route but the destination as well, you need to be able to park your bike and be sure it's still going to be there when you want to go back!If it's like any of the other route where you seem to have to ride along short sections of track and then cross roads and mess about then it won't be popular. I wonder if anyone who planned these have actually tried to use some sections.IMHO the organisation doing the most to boost cycling in Leeds are First. They've certainly done that with me.
I like work. I can watch it for hours.

raveydavey
Posts: 2886
Joined: Thu 22 Mar, 2007 3:59 pm
Location: The Far East (of Leeds...)
Contact:

Post by raveydavey »

When York Road was remodeled for the misguided busway (10 years ago now?), one of the three inbound lanes on the Torre Road flyover was taken from general traffic and made into a cycle lane.However, due to the circuitous way of accessing the cycle lane (take the slip road off York Road, then up onto the path for one of those lovely short cycle paths. Stop, wait for a gap in traffic on the slip road to clear, then proceed back across the slip road, into the cycle lane and set off up hill from a near standing start) and the fact it never seems to be swept by the council so is eternally full of rubbish just waiting to foul wheels or cause punctures, most cyclists simply carry on in the inside lane along with the traffic they should be kept well away from. The procedure at the other end of the flyover is similarly complicated too.So having expensive cycle lanes is all well and good, but unless they are actually of any use they'll simply be ignored
Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act – George Orwell

jonleeds
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 31 Jan, 2008 4:59 pm

Post by jonleeds »

I'm a regular cyclist and to be honest I dont like riding on a lot of main roads, cycle path or not. I've nearly lost my life once in a cycling road accident where I sustained a serious head injury and ended up in a coma for weeks. I'm not a reckless cyclist and I always wear a helmet and I have lights on my cycle and I wear hi-viz vest. While its good to encourage cycling for the environment and peoples health you cant pretend that cyclings not dangerous because it is. The amount of near misses I've had is frightening, and I bet if you ask virtually any other cyclist they'll agree that you are taking your life in your own hands when you cycle on the main roads, especially at rush hour. Anyway this is a debate that could have a forum of its own.I think the council provides these cycle routes more as a need to show they are investing in green transport alternatives. There have been some improvements for cycling in Leeds but to be truly safe I think cycles should have proper cycle lanes that are seperate from the main road. I'm fortunate that I live not far from the canal and if I've got enough time I'll cycle that way into the city, but its not suitable as a 'mass transit' solution.
Have your fun when you're alive - you won't get nothing when you die... have a good time all the time! - Chumbawumba!

And no matter how things end, you should always keep in touch with your friends - Dave Gedge

Jogon
Posts: 3036
Joined: Wed 21 Dec, 2011 1:28 pm

Post by Jogon »

jonSame, agreed.Wykebeck ok if you live there.Coincidentally I just did this:-http://www.secretleeds.co.uk/forum/Mess ... eadID=3564

Post Reply