Leeds news on today's date (September 2) in 1841 and 1867.
- Leodian
- Posts: 6518
- Joined: Thu 10 Jun, 2010 8:03 am
The following are from John Mayhall’s ‘Annals of Yorkshire’.Volume 1. September 2nd 1841. “Leeds Parish Church. The solemn and imposing ceremony of re-opening and consecrating the church of St. Peter, situate in Kirkgate, which had been rebuilt by the voluntary contributions of the inhabitants at a cost of £29,770 6s. 8d., took place on Thursday the 2nd of September…The pulling down of the old fabric commenced the week after Ash-Wednesday, 1838; from which time the parochial service was transferred to St. John’s church. The whole of the church was taken down and re-built, with the exception of a portion of the south wall”.There was much more in the report, which ran from page 472 to 477 and also had an unnumbered page that had a nice engraving of the ‘South East View of the Leeds Parish Church in 1817’ engraved by Henry Le Pettit and published by Joseph Johnson (I have added a scanned copy of that engraving). I like the very precise “£29,770 6s. 8d.” in the report. According to an inflation calculator in the Bank of England website £29,770 in 1841 was equivalent to about £2,534,000 in 2011 at an average inflation rate of 2.6% a year.Volume 3. September 2nd 1867. “The extensive alterations to be made in the widening and improvement of Boar Lane, Leeds, were commenced this day, near the bottom of Albion street, on the premises of Mr. Masser”.
- Attachments
-
- __TFMF_zvgywxq51opqzrb2l205cevf_7f126494-e023-436d-8464-ea5b17b20c77_0_main.jpg (186.74 KiB) Viewed 1593 times
A rainbow is a ribbon that Nature puts on when she washes her hair.
- Leodian
- Posts: 6518
- Joined: Thu 10 Jun, 2010 8:03 am
-
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri 02 Mar, 2012 7:39 pm
Leodian wrote: Cheers chemimike and Tasa. I knew it was about to become a Minster but I had forgotten it was today! For such a magnificent building (inside and out) it should have been a Minster long ago. Hear Hear,over the years I've always been fascinated by the headstones bedecked at an acute angle on the railway embankments nearby too.
I'm not just anybody,I am sommebody !
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2012 7:34 pm
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am
Hi Caron. In the late 1860s when the first railway to cross Leeds from west to east was being built, the most suitable route to connect existing railways on opposite sides of the city was through the then graveyard, and dealing with gravestones was thought to be best dealt with by replacing them on the embankment side after the remains had been reinterred elsewhere. There was considerable feeling about it at the time.
-
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2012 7:34 pm
jim wrote: Hi Caron. In the late 1860s when the first railway to cross Leeds from west to east was being built, the most suitable route to connect existing railways on opposite sides of the city was through the then graveyard, and dealing with gravestones was thought to be best dealt with by replacing them on the embankment side after the remains had been reinterred elsewhere. There was considerable feeling about it at the time. Thanks jim for the answer. What an odd place to put them though....