Another Tower...

jdbythesea · Post by **jdbythesea** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 8:03 pm

Leodian wrote: munki wrote: Shortly before finally leaving Leeds City Council I got to realise a bit of a personal ambition. Unfortunately I only had my iphone with me so the pics are not great, but I thought I would share them with you via facebook, here.http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid= ... =1&theater Hi munki. I can only see a photo of an open/shut lever when using the link and there does not seem to be any more pics (certainly none that I can access). Should I be able to see more or do I need to be a member of Facebook in order to see more pics? Thanks. Same problem here. All I can see is a rather interesting lever.

Post by **chameleon** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 9:41 pm

jdbythesea wrote: Leodian wrote: munki wrote: Shortly before finally leaving Leeds City Council I got to realise a bit of a personal ambition. Unfortunately I only had my iphone with me so the pics are not great, but I thought I would share them with you via facebook, here.http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid= ... =1&theater Hi munki. I can only see a photo of an open/shut lever when using the link and there does not seem to be any more pics (certainly none that I can access). Should I be able to see more or do I need to be a member of Facebook in order to see more pics? Thanks. Same problem here. All I can see is a rather interesting lever. You will need to sign-in register on facebook to see them all I think.

Post by **chameleon** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 9:51 pm

tyke bhoy wrote: munki wrote: Yeah well I wasn't sure where leaving LCC would leave me, with relation to Secret Leeds... In fact, I asked for clarification but am still not sure! I think your account has been demoted to User which to all extent and purposes reduces you to the plebs like me. However Chameleon and CNOSNI are also only designated users too so you may still retain powers above the rest of us and I, for one, would not object to that. Indeed and we would have suffered in the past without the support of Munki as a founder administrator. Trying to remain impartial and fair to everyone isn't always easy - and we don't always entirely agree with what needs to be done but, integrity of and preserving the site comes first. One wonders at the motivation behind such a move - wholly unnecesseary in practical terms and any implied suggestion by this move the munki would act in any malicious way towards his pride and joy is shortsighted and ludicrous.

munki · Post by **munki** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 10:45 pm

Yeah I asked / offered to carry on being an admin but was told that I wasn't allowed to be. My last act as an admin was to demote myself to a user, which felt a bit odd... but not unlike the much of the very stupid logic going on around Leeds City Council at the moment.

munki · Post by **munki** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 10:52 pm

Hm. Interesting.

Phill_dvsn · Post by **Phill_dvsn** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 10:53 pm

munki wrote: Yeah I asked / offered to carry on being an admin but was told that I wasn't allowed to be. My last act as an admin was to demote myself to a user, which felt a bit odd... but not unlike the much of the very stupid logic going on around Leeds City Council at the moment. We don't have the facebook 'like' option on S.L. So this will have to do Munki I have to agree with you!

Post by **tyke bhoy** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 11:03 pm

munki wrote: Yeah I asked / offered to carry on being an admin but was told that I wasn't allowed to be. My last act as an admin was to demote myself to a user, which felt a bit odd... but not unlike the much of the very stupid logic going on around Leeds City Council at the moment. Not meaning to dis Duncan but does this put us in the hands of an autocracy? Or has another admin been appointed? Hail Caesar or something like that

munki · Post by **munki** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 11:13 pm

I think it means that SL is now a non-hierarchichal autonomous collective.

munki · Post by **munki** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 11:13 pm

...or something.

Post by **chameleon** » Fri 02 Dec, 2011 11:17 pm

munki wrote: Hm. Interesting. We should question not....maybe??