Merrion Place Stones

Spackler · Post by **Spackler** » Thu 26 May, 2011 9:20 pm

"Parts of their inscriptions are eroding, particularly the 9 in the 1934 year which is so poor now it looks like 1034 in each."Nice work on the pics Leodian, hijack away! Indeed it was the 1034 that made me double take and stop and make me look at them. Like Steve said there were a lot of these stones which made me wonder why so many on such a building.

Leodian · Post by **Leodian** » Thu 26 May, 2011 9:39 pm

Spackler wrote: "Parts of their inscriptions are eroding, particularly the 9 in the 1934 year which is so poor now it looks like 1034 in each."Nice work on the pics Leodian, hijack away! Indeed it was the 1034 that made me double take and stop and make me look at them. Like Steve said there were a lot of these stones which made me wonder why so many on such a building. Thanks for that Spackler. It is appeciated.

Post by **chameleon** » Thu 26 May, 2011 10:57 pm

Leodian wrote: Well they all seemed to be added despite getting a "A generic error occurred in GDI+. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code" messsage when I sent in each! It's an ongoing issue Leodian - ignore and continue, as you see, the pictures are added anyway