Playground games
-
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Wed 06 Feb, 2008 6:09 pm
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am
Relievo - basically a "tigs" ( or "tag" ) variant. The object is for whoever is "it" to tig all the other players. Tigged players retire to the home or den, a designated holding area. If a player not yet tigged manages to enter the holding area, all previous captives are released. The game can go on interminably and is the source of much falling out. These are the basic principles, but there were many local variants and alternative rules ( which led to even more falling out! ).
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Tue 24 Jun, 2008 4:01 pm
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: Wed 10 Oct, 2007 7:22 am
- Location: Otley
jim wrote: Relievo - basically a "tigs" ( or "tag" ) variant. The object is for whoever is "it" to tig all the other players. Tigged players retire to the home or den, a designated holding area. If a player not yet tigged manages to enter the holding area, all previous captives are released. The game can go on interminably and is the source of much falling out. These are the basic principles, but there were many local variants and alternative rules ( which led to even more falling out! ). The version of Relievo we played incorporated hide-and-seek. The person who was "it" leant against a telegraph pole (the designated "base"), closed his eyes and counted to 49 (don't know why - we called the game Relievo Forty Nine) while the others hid. "It" had to find and "tig" them, while they tried to run to the base.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue 09 Dec, 2008 4:50 am
Hot Rice - The name rings a bell and im sure we played it at school in the late eighties (Thornhill Middle).Was it the one with a tennis ball played in a rectangle by about 20 kids, slowly getting knocked out by having the ball kicked passed you at lightening speed, your only hope of survival was taking a hit and vollying it back in some other poor souls direction. Think you got one chance to survive (yellow carded) before being knocked out (red carded) and I seem to remember if it was close that you could have stopped the ball then someone shouted 50/50 and you played on. Or am i getting confused with something else.
- tilly
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: Mon 11 Jan, 2010 2:32 pm
Si wrote: jim wrote: Relievo - basically a "tigs" ( or "tag" ) variant. The object is for whoever is "it" to tig all the other players. Tigged players retire to the home or den, a designated holding area. If a player not yet tigged manages to enter the holding area, all previous captives are released. The game can go on interminably and is the source of much falling out. These are the basic principles, but there were many local variants and alternative rules ( which led to even more falling out! ). The version of Relievo we played incorporated hide-and-seek. The person who was "it" leant against a telegraph pole (the designated "base"), closed his eyes and counted to 49 (don't know why - we called the game Relievo Forty Nine) while the others hid. "It" had to find and "tig" them, while they tried to run to the base. Hi Si Why do i always want folow this with. My little eye?The game you called Relievo we called Hide and Seek looks like the same rules.
No matter were i end my days im an Hunslet lad with Hunslet ways.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri 09 Jan, 2009 11:13 pm
HippoThank you. I've tried to explain the so-called leap frog game per orig. photo on other school threads.Late 50s -- Lower Wortley PS - playtime game for the Macho was SHIP & ANCHORThe bloke with his back to the wall was the anchor.His team (max 4) lined up, head up bum. They were the ship.The other team (cargo) had to vault up the the backs of the ship until all there. object: - cargo to crush the spines of the ship.Many sadistic rules involved. could explain laterThis game was totally approved by the despot headmaster Arthur Cox.Later at West Leeds BHS we started the game up again to the approval of the sports teacher,Stan Wilson. It got out of control -puberty violence.I think some of the teachers ( can't say masters ) imagined we were at Eton and its Wall Game.TTFNAndy
-
- Posts: 1898
- Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am
Hi Pashy 2, I must have preceded you at Lower Wortley and West Leeds ( 1949-52, 1952-56 respectively ) and was surprised to see you found either of Arthur Cox or Stan Wilson despotic or sadistic. I always found them both thoroughly decent blokes - unlike some West Leeds "masters" ( they still wore gowns when I was there ) who appeared to model themselves on the other side in the then recent war.
-
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Wed 06 Feb, 2008 6:09 pm