Burley in Wharfedale Weir

Bunkers, shelters and other buildings
Post Reply
mcnab
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 21 Jul, 2007 7:30 am

Post by mcnab »

It is in LS29, does secret leeds cover B in W?If you like puzzles and old structures take a trip to the weir there.A debate rages on the stepping stones that aren't stepping stones, they are there to control the water and they want to build a bridge there.The weir fed water to Greenholme Mills along a goit system, it was one of the first to be run on electricity, hydro electricity. The weir steps the river down something like 6 metres, I wonder what the river looked like before the weir; natural waterfall or was the bed built up upstram or reduced down stream? How do you think the weir would have been constructed back in 1790
Attachments
__TFMF_rfnsbk45xkv5pa55df3v2aj1_5cda5916-f914-4dca-94c3-5b9740e59d88_0_main.jpg
__TFMF_rfnsbk45xkv5pa55df3v2aj1_5cda5916-f914-4dca-94c3-5b9740e59d88_0_main.jpg (73.1 KiB) Viewed 4874 times

Si
Posts: 4480
Joined: Wed 10 Oct, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Otley

Post by Si »

They built a dam to hold the water back while they constructed the weir...    

jim
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am

Post by jim »

But first they had to shovel the water out to build the dam.........By the way Si, where's Ian with those photos? ( or should I keep quiet?..... )

Si
Posts: 4480
Joined: Wed 10 Oct, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Otley

Post by Si »

jim wrote: But first they had to shovel the water out to build the dam.........By the way Si, where's Ian with those photos? ( or should I keep quiet?..... ) I think he's had some bother with his computer. I'll remind him when I see him!

mcnab
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 21 Jul, 2007 7:30 am

Post by mcnab »

Perhaps.... or did they temporarily divert the river? along the ditch marked my the line of trees on the north bank, there is evidence of some sort dam wall where the trees finish....    Where can I see a map dated earlier than 1790 so I can see the run of the river before the weir was built, would such a thing exist?The banks have been raised upstream of the weir by approx 2.4m, the weir boards used to consist of one board approx 0.6m high with another on sacraficial iron pegs 0.6m above that, designed to fall flat if the pressure from the water got too great. This dam obviously raised water levels upstream and lowered them down stream, but it's the huge difference between the levels of the river bed above and below that intrigues me.I'm trying to figure out how it would have been before the weir was built; a natural waterfall? or did the river take a different route altogether?

Burley Archive
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat 08 Jun, 2019 1:15 pm
Location: Burley in Wharfedale

Re: Burley in Wharfedale Weir

Post by Burley Archive »

mcnab wrote:
Sun 11 Jul, 2010 7:03 pm
The weir steps the river down something like 6 metres, I wonder what the river looked like before the weir; natural waterfall or was the bed built up upstream or reduced down stream? How do you think the weir would have been constructed back in 1790
Greenholme - Burley in Wharfedale
The original weir was built of timber.
According to the account of Henry Whitaker (son of Jonas Whitaker, one of the original partners who built Greenholme Mills) in his diary printed in 1889 - "I well remember the old weir at Greenholme. The top or upper part of was made of strong planking, and this was propped by substantially-made beams. Over this planking the water fell a distance of 3 or 4 feet on to an inclined stone platform, which sloped down to a square wooden sill made of strong balks, and extended across the river. From these balks there was a drop of about a foot or eighteen inches into a deep pool."

The description by Henry Whitaker of the original timber weir suggests that it wasn't as high as the current stone one. (It also begs the question if it was located at the same place).
mcnab wrote:
Mon 12 Jul, 2010 9:46 pm
Where can I see a map dated earlier than 1790 so I can see the run of the river before the weir was built, would such a thing exist?
There are two maps by "Jefferys" - one of 1771 & one of 1775. On the page link above, I've shown the 1775 map.
There is no marked loop of the river shown at Greenholme.
(How accurate the maps are when referring to the surveying of rivers is open to conjecture).

I'm wondering if the first mill was built on the existing (1790) river channel, the river was then canalised (i.e. the goit) & raised embankments with a timber weir were then constructed upstream to make use of an old river channel (i.e. the loop) to act as an overflow channel (now the current river alignment).

Post Reply