Prostitution Leeds

Crazy Jane · Post by **Crazy Jane** » Thu 17 Sep, 2009 11:02 pm

I'd have to confess that i've never known one to go like that.Maybe she dropped a box of them and the mercury leaked out and addled her, it might explain her poor judgement.

Trojan · Post by **Trojan** » Thu 17 Sep, 2009 11:08 pm

zip55 wrote: Deffo on Spencer Place ... and the Gaeity had strippers at lunchtimes in the 70's ... The Gaiety is mentioned in Roger Cross's book about the Ripper, I think he picked up one of his victims there. (the Ripper that is not Roger Cross)

liits · Post by **liits** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 8:13 am

simong wrote: Reginal Perrin wrote: Can someone tell me how places like Winstons get away with trading blatantly as a knocking shop? Are th epolice just happy to have it contained largely in one place? Prostitution still isn't illegal, and never has been. What is illegal is soliciting and kerb crawling. Winston's, or Churchill's on Dewsbury Road, don't do either. I know the boss of Churchill's and indeed did some web work for the place a couple of years ago, and it's not even illegal to book 'escorts' online: as with lap dancing, what the dancer/escort and punter agree to after the introduction is entirely up to them.The city and the police do occasionally have a clampdown, and I believe did so about nine months ago, and can raid properties on the grounds of public nuisance or the various charges associated with prostitution, such as living on immoral earnings, and I think Churchill's was shut for a bit, which may or may not be on a tacit agreement with the police. However, their official status is as escort clubs and as long as they meet the general standards for such clubs they can stay in business. Since the licensing act changed to give us its new form, Local Authorities now look after all forms of licensing not just bits of it.Things like Lap Dancing clubs, not that I’m saying that they’re knocking shops, now only have the same license as an ordinary pub –or the few that are left. The only possible difference between then being that the lap dance venue has “Dancing” [the type, form, style or by whom not specified] as a licensable activity.If the venue has a SEE License [Sex Encounter Establishment] e.g. massage parlour, sauna etc they have a different licensable activity where “where sexual stimulation for the customer is brought about by the exposing of genitals, urinary or excretory organs or other parts of the body” [note that it says by the customer].This was a big slip up for when licensing laws changed. Now there is a presumption to grant ALL licenses unless there is just cause to refuse. Seemingly, objecting to a lap dancing club because dancing is carried out won’t get the licence refused and because they only dance, they don’t need a SEE license!Lots of pubs in London who had the foresight to ask for dancing as a licensable activity when the 2003 Act came in are now putting on lap or pole dancing nights. Coming to a pub near you...... [before it shuts down, presumably].

biggee99 · Post by **biggee99** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 10:16 am

Not a good thing prostitution but think of it like this how many wife's are with there husbands for one thing money, and how many would stick with the husbands boy friends if they had no money, now don't go one guys think about it?????????? the truth hurts

Cardiarms · Post by **Cardiarms** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 11:57 am

So you're saying a lot of women are just sponging prozzies?

simonm · Post by **simonm** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 12:04 pm

Don's tin hat and creeps under bed to avoid [edit]!

Lilysmum · Post by **Lilysmum** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 12:44 pm

biggee99 wrote: Not a good thing prostitution but think of it like this how many wife's are with there husbands for one thing money, and how many would stick with the husbands boy friends if they had no money, now don't go one guys think about it?????????? the truth hurts Was going to post a reply to this comment but it's probably best just to ask Brandy to put a BIG line under it!!!!!

biggee99 · Post by **biggee99** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 12:55 pm

No certainly not all of them.

biggee99 · Post by **biggee99** » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 6:26 pm

It a real world we live in and money talks. I know so called friend who would not talk to you if you had no money when people get close to the truth it hurts, secrets and life. They are many people who get paid to surf around the internet around £125 per week to give disinformation paid by organisations to make fun of the truth that we are getting close to, any way back to secret Leeds got some good stuff underground in cross gates this is big and going to blow the lid on this story with photos, but might get pulled off the forum not in the pubic interest well i will try it soon.don't meen to affend but only the truth.

Si · Post by Si » Fri 18 Sep, 2009 6:35 pm

Biggee, this forum is self-policing, and there is no truth in the rumour that you can be edited for sayi