Leeds Station southern entrance plans approved

Railways, trams, buses, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
BarFly
Posts: 525
Joined: Sun 06 Nov, 2011 3:39 pm
Location: In t' pub in Leeds (see picture).

Post by BarFly »

Dare I say I quite like the look of the proposed entrance. Though I did find it a little disappointing that they felt the need to cut away some of the stone at the bottom of the arches -- I think it would have been better to leave the existing structure unaltered and just add the new "growth" on.

BLAKEY
Posts: 2556
Joined: Mon 24 Mar, 2008 4:42 am

Post by BLAKEY »

BarFly wrote: Dare I say I quite like the look of the proposed entrance. Though I did find it a little disappointing that they felt the need to cut away some of the stone at the bottom of the arches -- I think it would have been better to leave the existing structure unaltered and just add the new "growth" on. I agree with you there BarFly - I also like the futuristic and ambitious design of the entry in its own right. If it was to be part of a whole new station in a similar style I'd be all for it, but to "throw it" at such a traditional part of the older City makes it completely incongruous and I honestly think it looks just ridiculous, as if something has just landed from outer space.
There's nothing like keeping the past alive - it makes us relieved to reflect that any bad times have gone, and happy to relive all the joyful and fascinating experiences of our own and other folks' earlier days.

jim
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am

Post by jim »

Unfortunately the new entry will not be fully viewed by the majority of those using it. I have concerns that the access routes to this structure may not be prepossessing, and that there will be a lack of parking space near enough to attract footfall.

raveydavey
Posts: 2886
Joined: Thu 22 Mar, 2007 3:59 pm
Location: The Far East (of Leeds...)
Contact:

Post by raveydavey »

BLAKEY wrote: BarFly wrote: Dare I say I quite like the look of the proposed entrance. Though I did find it a little disappointing that they felt the need to cut away some of the stone at the bottom of the arches -- I think it would have been better to leave the existing structure unaltered and just add the new "growth" on. I agree with you there BarFly - I also like the futuristic and ambitious design of the entry in its own right. If it was to be part of a whole new station in a similar style I'd be all for it, but to "throw it" at such a traditional part of the older City makes it completely incongruous and I honestly think it looks just ridiculous, as if something has just landed from outer space. I think it's got a look of the Thames barrier about it. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing...
Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act – George Orwell

User avatar
cnosni
Site Admin
Posts: 4199
Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by cnosni »

jim wrote: Unfortunately the new entry will not be fully viewed by the majority of those using it. I have concerns that the access routes to this structure may not be prepossessing, and that there will be a lack of parking space near enough to attract footfall. The new entrance isnt about parking for footfall Jim, its about opening up the station to the south of town and the offices in Holbeck Urban Village.It will be easier and quicker for those people working/living in the area to access the station, and if anything may tempt those people who park in Holbeck currently to get to their work to use the train.Might be a generational thing as well but i like the look of it as well.BTW why do you think the access route may not be prepossessing, something you have noticed perhaps?
Don't get me started!!My Flickr photos-http://www.flickr.com/photos/cnosni/Secret Leeds [email protected]

User avatar
cnosni
Site Admin
Posts: 4199
Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by cnosni »

BLAKEY wrote: BarFly wrote: Dare I say I quite like the look of the proposed entrance. Though I did find it a little disappointing that they felt the need to cut away some of the stone at the bottom of the arches -- I think it would have been better to leave the existing structure unaltered and just add the new "growth" on. I agree with you there BarFly - I also like the futuristic and ambitious design of the entry in its own right. If it was to be part of a whole new station in a similar style I'd be all for it, but to "throw it" at such a traditional part of the older City makes it completely incongruous and I honestly think it looks just ridiculous, as if something has just landed from outer space. Apart from the viaduct and the old wharfs the buildings around it are all new, even the station building is modern looking.Another thing is that it will bring footfall to the dark arches where there are restaurants and bars, pretty good ones as well, so it will be good for their trade.Perhaps it will stimulate more businesses as well.
Don't get me started!!My Flickr photos-http://www.flickr.com/photos/cnosni/Secret Leeds [email protected]

Cardiarms
Posts: 2993
Joined: Tue 21 Oct, 2008 8:30 am

Post by Cardiarms »

IIRC the drawings for HS2 showed a pedestrian walkway connecting the two stations going through this entrance, so if that goes ahead it'll be temporary and replaced in about, ooh, say, 20 years.

jim
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 10:09 am

Post by jim »

Hi cnosni. As a purely personal opinion I don't view a walkway alongside or beneath the City Station arches as prepossessing. I also can't see the available already well filled parking spaces or the total available office space within practical walking distance (say quarter of a mile) of the new entrance worth the effort and money involved in the new provision. We shall probably have to agree to disagree. Edit:- Written while two posts above appeared!

WiggyDiggy
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed 09 Jun, 2010 11:39 am

Post by WiggyDiggy »

Cardiarms wrote: IIRC the drawings for HS2 showed a pedestrian walkway connecting the two stations going through this entrance, so if that goes ahead it'll be temporary and replaced in about, ooh, say, 20 years. Thats your alternative then? Dont build it and wait 20 years before doing anything?

User avatar
tyke bhoy
Posts: 2420
Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Leeds/Wakefield
Contact:

Post by tyke bhoy »

jim wrote: I have concerns that the access routes to this structure may not be prepossessing, and that there will be a lack of parking space near enough to attract footfall. I think the majority of the footfall is expected to be those walking at Walmart/Asda and in an around the rest of "Holbeck Village" who's journey on foot from the station may well be reduced 10-15 minutes. There is a constant stream southbound on Neville Street from before 7.30 to beyond 9.00 and northbound from 4.00pm - 6.00pm. Admittedly some of this foot traffic will have arrived in the vicinity of City Square on a bus or dropped off by car but the vast majority will be from the station.It will also be handy for the Hilton and Doubletree by Hilton hotels especially by those that realise they can pretty much have walked to reception by the time they have walked to the existing taxi rank which then requires over a mile up Whitehall Road and back via Water LaneIt may also see an "encouragement" of current car users in the Holbeck Village to switch to trains especially if accompanied by a crackdown on the low cost of the car parks on Sweet Street
living a stones throw from the Leeds MDC border at Lofthousehttp://tykebhoy.wordpress.com/

Post Reply