Jimmy Savile

Phill_dvsn · Post by **Phill_dvsn** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 1:50 pm

It seems to get worse Broadcaster Paul Gambaccini has claimed Leeds’s own Sir Jimmy Savile used his charity fundraising work as a lever to prevent his private life being exposed.http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4979365

Chrism · Post by **Chrism** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 3:18 pm

Phill_dvsn wrote: It seems to get worse Broadcaster Paul Gambaccini has claimed Leeds’s own Sir Jimmy Savile used his charity fundraising work as a lever to prevent his private life being exposed.http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4979365 People can say all they want, Jim is NOT here to defend these allegations so nothing can be carved into stone as to whether he did or didn't. I myself don't believe it, why didn't these people come forward when he was alive?

Jogon · Post by **Jogon** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 3:37 pm

Understand Esther Rantzen has also contributed, saying rumours followed JS

Phill_dvsn · Post by **Phill_dvsn** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 6:00 pm

Jogon wrote: Understand Esther Rantzen has also contributed, saying rumours followed JS Pretty much in short what the program will showhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-221059 ... s.htmlIt's just a case of wait to see what they show, then people can decide what they think later.

raveydavey · Post by **raveydavey** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 6:07 pm

It seems odd that respected broadcasters such as Esther Rantzen and Paul Gambacini didn't speak out earlier if they had concerns...

Derculees · Post by **Derculees** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 7:22 pm

Remember that old British naval epigram, 'Flog that man!, - but he's dead sir, then flog his kit!' Hope his charities don't get a flogging as a result.

liits · Post by **liits** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 8:25 pm

Jogon wrote: Understand Esther Rantzen has also contributed, saying rumours followed JS She'd jump on any bandwaggon to get her sgraggy neck on the telly.

drapesy · Post by **drapesy** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 9:30 pm

So then, gentlemen, we're all agreed ?Jimmy Savile is innocent.Glad that's all sorted.

anthonydna · Post by **anthonydna** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 9:32 pm

You could post as many facts as you like, you wont convince some pepole.

LS1 · Post by **LS1** » Mon 01 Oct, 2012 10:59 pm

Chrism wrote: Phill_dvsn wrote: It seems to get worse Broadcaster Paul Gambaccini has claimed Leeds’s own Sir Jimmy Savile used his charity fundraising work as a lever to prevent his private life being exposed.http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4979365 People can say all they want, Jim is NOT here to defend these allegations so nothing can be carved into stone as to whether he did or didn't. I myself don't believe it, why didn't these people come forward when he was alive? Whether it's true or not, even if he were still here and he was guilty (which I neither believe or disbelieve) it's hardly likely he'd readily admit it.