Jimmy Savile

somme1916 · Post by **somme1916** » Thu 08 Nov, 2012 11:51 pm

Phill_dvsn wrote: And already Tom Watson is already being told to back off..Tom Watson said “people who should know” had told him he would be at risk if he decided to “dig any deeper” into the claims, which he raised in Parliament last monthRead More http://www.birminghampost.net/news/poli ... z2Bfq8heRK You've got to admire this guy.....he doesn't give up easy.What next,secret meetings of COBRA,GCHQ put on high alert,top police brought in for a "briefing" ????????

James · Post by **James** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 9:54 am

Phill_dvsn wrote: Savile is the catalyst that will bring down a very seedy house of commons cards. It would be a well deserved end to this depraved bunch of politicians - if what is alleged is true and it all gets into the public arena. However, I think we underestimate the power of the elite to close ranks and get the facts suppressed by pulling rank (and wires) with the establishment censors who control what gets into the media.

somme1916 · Post by **somme1916** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 10:00 am

James wrote: Phill_dvsn wrote: Savile is the catalyst that will bring down a very seedy house of commons cards. It would be a well deserved end to this depraved bunch of politicians - if what is alleged is true and it all gets into the public arena. However, I think we underestimate the power of the elite to close ranks and get the facts suppressed by pulling rank (and wires) with the establishment censors who control what gets into the media. Very true James....there are possibly several signs of this happening already with certain media sites closed for further comment/discussion etc etc

simong · Post by **simong** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 10:36 am

Yet in today's Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/nov/0 ... buse-claim

somme1916 · Post by **somme1916** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 10:54 am

simong wrote: Yet in today's Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/nov/0 ... buse-claim Yes,any publication casting doubt on the authenticity of the original story will be well supported by many leading establishment figures of course.......it's the "other" bits they don't take too kindly to.

Cardiarms · Post by **Cardiarms** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 1:16 pm

I'm off to collect kindling.

edlong · Post by **edlong** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 5:57 pm

Phill_dvsn wrote: Interesting...http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/20 ... ttedPage=1 Those of you doing background reading might want to look into the history of that Giovannni di Stefano fella before giving too much credibility to this...

Phill_dvsn · Post by **Phill_dvsn** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 6:53 pm

edlong wrote: Phill_dvsn wrote: Interesting...http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/20 ... ttedPage=1 Those of you doing background reading might want to look into the history of that Giovannni di Stefano fella before giving too much credibility to this... That's just one of many sources of background info. I could have linked to a good number of any, I just happened to choose that one. But thanks

raveydavey · Post by **raveydavey** » Fri 09 Nov, 2012 10:25 pm

And all this when the Levinson enquiry could well be set to limit further what the press can print...a cynic might smell a rat.

James · Post by **James** » Sat 10 Nov, 2012 9:40 am

It now appears that a case of mistaken identity is asserted by one of the politicians alluded to in the media. This man will sue everyone in sight, and if he's innocent, so he should. (Note that the reported victim has withdrawn his allegations.) This is the beginning of a big climb down as the media folk try to cover their backs. Journalists will not be keen to investigate the extent of the abuse scandal if an action for massive damages is looming in a very high profile case.How this will affect the Savile scandal is anyone's guess.