Page 1 of 1

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 1:36 pm
by Si
Will the government's proposed changes to Empty Property Rate Relief (ie rate increases on empty properties) mean an increase in unused buildings in Leeds (possibly of historical/architectural interest) being deliberately made unratable/demolished?

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 2:26 pm
by Bunk3r
or it could mean that people dont leave old buildings doing nothing, but knock them down for their land value and to avoid paying rates in the meantime.

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 3:06 pm
by Si
Yep. More "mysterious fires....."

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 3:11 pm
by munki
Or, without wanting to sound hopelessly naieve & unfashionably uncynical... it might mean that people are encouraged to make better use of buildings that are currently standing empty!Am I living in a dream world?

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 3:21 pm
by Si
No, Munki. That would be preferable, obviously. It depends on financial priorities. But, as we seem to be talking ourselves into a recession...

Posted: Mon 17 Mar, 2008 8:01 pm
by chameleon
munki wrote: Or, without wanting to sound hopelessly naieve & unfashionably uncynical... it might mean that people are encouraged to make better use of buildings that are currently standing empty!Am I living in a dream world? The potential high return from renovating and bringing back into use the many listed properties in our City's inventory and which are rapidly falling to ruin doesn't sem to inspire much action munki, so I doubt an increased rates bill will.

Posted: Tue 18 Mar, 2008 10:13 am
by Si
The opposite, I'm afraid, Chameleon.

Posted: Tue 18 Mar, 2008 6:41 pm
by chameleon
Si wrote: The opposite, I'm afraid, Chameleon. Sceptical perhaps, but we'll wait and see.