COLUMN ON DEVONSHIRE AVE LS8
- chameleon
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Thu 29 Mar, 2007 6:16 pm
Brunel wrote: Three more pics with more detail of the top and inspection hatch.They are marked Latesthttp://snipurl.com/eymz0 Thanks Brunel, clearly shows what I was describing - it is very realistic as something else, isn't it?
Emial: [email protected]: [email protected]
- chameleon
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Thu 29 Mar, 2007 6:16 pm
'02 airwaves! its a police relay mast il put my money on itps/again lol 'Nope - plain old mobile and 3G services from this one Brandy
Emial: [email protected]: [email protected]
-
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 8:03 am
yep your right Chameleon they got permission back in 06 for it.That's why its painted 'vodafone' red lol
- Attachments
-
- __TFMF_nz1blradd1rrij45sybnx255_dc96b039-8c82-4d87-a01c-8efbaa62343b_0_main.jpg (73.04 KiB) Viewed 1580 times
There are only 10 types of people in the world -those who understand binary, and those that don't.
- chameleon
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Thu 29 Mar, 2007 6:16 pm
That's right, this one is O2 not Vodafone. The Base Station info on sitefinder indicates its usage. The Emergency services (along with other private user networks use the Tetra system which operates at lower frequencies The plant to this one is hardly secure either it could be disabled in minutes!
Emial: [email protected]: [email protected]
-
- Posts: 1550
- Joined: Wed 21 Feb, 2007 8:03 am
Brunel wrote: If you search on Sightfinder for Devonshire Ave, it has a wobbly and shows the known site on Street Lane.NO site is shown on Devonshire Ave. yeah i know what you mean Brunel.And according to the planning office it doesn't even exist?? weired or what?
There are only 10 types of people in the world -those who understand binary, and those that don't.
- chameleon
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5462
- Joined: Thu 29 Mar, 2007 6:16 pm
Brandy wrote: Brunel wrote: If you search on Sightfinder for Devonshire Ave, it has a wobbly and shows the known site on Street Lane.NO site is shown on Devonshire Ave. yeah i know what you mean Brunel.And according to the planning office it doesn't even exist?? weired or what? A couple of posibilities here other than error Brandy, first, the authority may have failed to respond to the application within the time limit thus allowing the mast anyway or, more likely this one comes under the provisions of permitted development where no application is needed.
Emial: [email protected]: [email protected]
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue 21 Jul, 2009 11:51 am
Hi, sorry for the threadromancy. Been browsing the site for info on Carr Manors and came across this one.Pretty sure it isn't a telecoms mast, we usually build them with somewhere for the antennas to radiate from, this photo here shows very little room up top for even a single one (normally three) housed in a shroud. For dual technologies we would probably use 3 2G antenna's and 3 3G antenna's so 99% certain it is not "CSR 17684 Roundhay" - or 3 Multiband antennas depending on what platform was built when.On a side note, the VF and O2 sites that are close together on sitefinder will likely be merged into one site in the near future due to the sharing agreement between the two companies. So you better get your photo's done quick No clue what the image is shown, but asking around to see if anyone knows. That is if there is anybody left to ask, we are all at risk of redundancy