THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Explore your roots & tell us your family's history!
Post Reply
User avatar
liits
Posts: 1153
Joined: Sun 25 Mar, 2007 11:24 am
Location: North London
Contact:

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by liits »

Bruno wrote:Having had quite a busy late Christmas evening on the pop, following a day of abstinence due to to driving obligations, I have been reminded that it seems to be quite some time since I last owned a pair of underpants with an opening in the front.
Can't you turn Long-Johns around and use the trap door at the back? [sorry, only joking, but I know exactly what you mean].

User avatar
Leodian
Posts: 6485
Joined: Thu 10 Jun, 2010 8:03 am

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by Leodian »

When I was out a little earlier I happened to notice a small red berry on the ground. My immediate thought however was that it was a ladybird and I was surprised to see one at this time of year. On realising it was a red berry it then struck me that I don't recall seeing any ladybirds this year. :(
A rainbow is a ribbon that Nature puts on when she washes her hair.

trophy
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun 04 May, 2008 11:21 am

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by trophy »

proper heavy road rollers instead we have silly little vibratory things which means a pot hole is replaced with a bump which disintagrates after a few months.

j.c.d.
Posts: 571
Joined: Mon 27 Jan, 2014 4:54 pm

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by j.c.d. »

A couple on Boxing day morning walking round their neighbourhood wearing new identical fawn sheepskins .
(Quite a few were those man made fibre ones from Italy, Cheapskins I used to call them) usually sold in pub car parks or the like.

BLAKEY
Posts: 2556
Joined: Mon 24 Mar, 2008 4:42 am

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by BLAKEY »

Leodian wrote:When I was out a little earlier I happened to notice a small red berry on the ground. My immediate thought however was that it was a ladybird and I was surprised to see one at this time of year. On realising it was a red berry it then struck me that I don't recall seeing any ladybirds this year. :(
That's strange Leodian - I think they've all been up Queenswood Drive because all Autumn they've frequently appeared on the external window sills and balconies of the flats. :| :|
There's nothing like keeping the past alive - it makes us relieved to reflect that any bad times have gone, and happy to relive all the joyful and fascinating experiences of our own and other folks' earlier days.

User avatar
Brunel
Posts: 1174
Joined: Thu 20 Mar, 2008 12:34 pm

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by Brunel »

From an old envelope.

The "BURTON" is embossed, extra work, extra cost, but it makes it look very posh.
Attachments
burton-HUDSON RD MILLS002.jpg
burton-HUDSON RD MILLS002.jpg (134.21 KiB) Viewed 2183 times

stutterdog
Posts: 859
Joined: Mon 15 Jun, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by stutterdog »

Table legs covered in a long sock like device which I think uncovered, would be thought of as a bit rude way back in the 40's-50s! Those of us who were born then would be familiar with this. My Granny who was born in 1873 and all the legs on her table had these things on them as had another lady who lived nearby whose ornate table legs were covered in this way! Of course the Victorians were very prudish and ladies legs were never seen. So uncovered legs of any description were frowned upon.
ex-Armley lad

hyperion
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat 07 Dec, 2013 3:58 pm

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by hyperion »

Hiya stutterdog,
The thing about Victorians they invented many things including double standards, and even better Pornography.
They say i have no talent and that I'm difficult to work with.And they say it as if its a bad thing

User avatar
Leodian
Posts: 6485
Joined: Thu 10 Jun, 2010 8:03 am

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by Leodian »

stutterdog wrote:Table legs covered in a long sock like device which I think uncovered, would be thought of as a bit rude way back in the 40's-50s! Those of us who were born then would be familiar with this. My Granny who was born in 1873 and all the legs on her table had these things on them as had another lady who lived nearby whose ornate table legs were covered in this way! Of course the Victorians were very prudish and ladies legs were never seen. So uncovered legs of any description were frowned upon.
Seeing how legs look on some women (and men wearing shorts) nowadays I think covering legs in public should be made the law! ;)
A rainbow is a ribbon that Nature puts on when she washes her hair.

Johnny39
Posts: 894
Joined: Mon 11 Jun, 2007 3:54 pm

Re: THINGS YOU DON'T SEE ANYMORE (Part 2)

Post by Johnny39 »

You never see kids playing French cricket anymore.
Daft I call it - What's for tea Ma?

Post Reply